Information on Result #474854

There is no (166, 232, 1673)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7001 187569 864699 181729 884144 965905 012569 246437 205167 854085 667793 370584 > 2232

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (166, 233, 1673)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction