Information on Result #474893

There is no (99, 233, 201)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14901 673550 506735 415343 345433 828122 947705 983589 850252 001529 498491 650168 > 2233

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (99, 234, 201)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction