Information on Result #474895
There is no (103, 233, 216)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14796 036364 895567 201200 602973 739553 895421 711530 866239 291454 322895 604827 > 2233
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (103, 234, 216)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |