Information on Result #474998

There is no (162, 234, 1240)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27609 699354 228737 927441 046661 019084 891449 031912 680309 337136 719675 048858 > 2234

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (162, 235, 1240)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction