Information on Result #475107

There is no (86, 236, 161)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 112957 738110 281868 969606 501870 052366 752593 214179 224525 041614 913959 748160 > 2236

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (86, 237, 161)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction