Information on Result #475221

There is no (165, 237, 1317)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 222030 411400 967373 310556 748187 936243 248734 778988 123658 943814 543582 366073 > 2237

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 238, 1317)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction