Information on Result #475256
There is no (86, 238, 161)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 527790 568679 861613 242244 743551 801240 255801 087041 695184 516584 347280 883120 > 2238
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (86, 239, 161)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |