Information on Result #475257

There is no (88, 238, 166)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 531202 354294 706098 796263 894397 783057 656703 568442 105777 577787 096228 229200 > 2238

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (88, 239, 166)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction