Information on Result #475261

There is no (96, 238, 188)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 464647 207253 849162 021165 415960 162063 188574 067452 213904 874886 791436 978308 > 2238

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 239, 188)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction