Information on Result #475295

There is no (164, 238, 1212)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 447126 006873 408116 462222 797547 435502 414990 238461 800053 873426 140527 666050 > 2238

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (164, 239, 1212)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction