Information on Result #475296

There is no (166, 238, 1344)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 448577 728991 808622 418479 034822 308018 337563 028459 920755 437687 621651 547675 > 2238

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (166, 239, 1344)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction