Information on Result #475298

There is no (170, 238, 1683)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 444213 827584 636440 205243 931843 842733 699400 854773 969149 844573 265082 516148 > 2238

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (170, 239, 1683)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction