Information on Result #475333
There is no (89, 239, 168)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 977154 521676 229369 179338 741332 279057 564991 998316 285144 688210 285527 254200 > 2239
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (89, 240, 168)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |