Information on Result #475375

There is no (173, 239, 1945)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 887831 941083 728024 678726 666030 220668 544694 869770 454263 106034 462645 295000 > 2239

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (173, 240, 1945)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction