Information on Result #475407
There is no (88, 240, 165)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 848827 829912 198938 199102 913688 334329 819507 582343 709539 919636 729483 838360 > 2240
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (88, 241, 165)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |