Information on Result #475563

There is no (96, 242, 186)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 228828 070319 712768 950022 692373 108126 153510 385369 096952 297724 227397 320586 > 2242

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 243, 186)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction