Information on Result #475568

There is no (106, 242, 220)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 486484 384025 318757 816187 396215 360060 717316 033897 195712 636050 031372 083322 > 2242

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (106, 243, 220)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction