Information on Result #475583

There is no (136, 242, 415)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 671200 618360 586279 916574 895371 529159 125840 727297 516190 922781 186758 893168 > 2242

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (136, 243, 415)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction