Information on Result #475637
There is no (89, 243, 167)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 16 222411 623500 395080 865508 396159 319032 144596 688327 817217 732470 911051 810400 > 2243
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (89, 244, 167)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |