Information on Result #475643

There is no (101, 243, 202)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 17 681457 586264 676163 550616 610030 472942 430274 215891 718906 038246 499394 938492 > 2243

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (101, 244, 202)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction