Information on Result #475753

There is no (168, 244, 1233)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 29 059929 953162 936655 244795 572015 391353 615031 838661 094948 414121 162490 239664 > 2244

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (168, 245, 1233)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction