Information on Result #475756
There is no (174, 244, 1695)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 28 836555 940262 590159 569262 804333 810463 802994 613702 622625 867856 990018 341336 > 2244
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (174, 245, 1695)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |