Information on Result #475955
There is no (105, 247, 213)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 269 640105 162012 286280 916554 852626 512908 037413 293102 628864 291945 161917 234664 > 2247
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (105, 248, 213)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |