Information on Result #475983

There is no (161, 247, 843)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 226 369768 259535 211091 584065 795051 778244 160111 291462 571374 012461 624964 675300 > 2247

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (161, 248, 843)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction