Information on Result #475987

There is no (169, 247, 1185)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 228 184620 524703 244111 160091 969140 409595 613007 032458 455115 053294 157321 629312 > 2247

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (169, 248, 1185)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction