Information on Result #476029

There is no (96, 248, 184)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 531 817701 595764 312014 175091 430853 839857 085223 368990 973769 046957 367457 840980 > 2248

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 249, 184)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction