Information on Result #476032

There is no (102, 248, 202)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 514 820827 586627 956197 843325 920548 437491 432858 578043 539962 144081 851402 852125 > 2248

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (102, 249, 202)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction