Information on Result #476033

There is no (104, 248, 209)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 559 898417 584097 537834 235040 957401 613835 042729 938021 835702 939935 070325 468338 > 2248

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (104, 249, 209)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction