Information on Result #476049

There is no (136, 248, 391)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 497 525865 789534 489378 343894 003975 301600 958575 316161 191467 030070 152573 895120 > 2248

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (136, 249, 391)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction