Information on Result #476061

There is no (160, 248, 795)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 452 441155 101380 529401 842828 028916 943670 059422 463328 263453 069056 781671 929184 > 2248

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (160, 249, 795)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction