Information on Result #476063
There is no (164, 248, 929)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 461 775112 350405 188149 340565 384885 714978 072747 394070 985220 758352 634741 908608 > 2248
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (164, 249, 929)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |