Information on Result #476069

There is no (176, 248, 1640)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 455 719873 148874 532639 430294 627696 513782 467523 283894 592903 491239 985321 030141 > 2248

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (176, 249, 1640)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction