Information on Result #476113

There is no (109, 249, 226)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1010 091041 254439 414220 044747 877692 707785 737504 094286 035209 961399 083600 086896 > 2249

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (109, 250, 226)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction