Information on Result #476190

There is no (106, 250, 214)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1921 996108 585485 847559 885573 873202 025906 773928 593303 614315 536666 195214 957894 > 2250

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (106, 251, 214)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction