Information on Result #476263

There is no (95, 251, 180)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 4020 719920 611336 202962 461867 433236 490080 744527 266873 948004 675752 964032 616808 > 2251

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (95, 252, 180)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction