Information on Result #476270
There is no (109, 251, 224)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3692 199356 891555 853069 471176 457465 430220 710535 084256 735204 236934 440905 412995 > 2251
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (109, 252, 224)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |