Information on Result #476298

There is no (165, 251, 904)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3760 901003 012381 713586 181173 165767 838170 394028 984573 245948 252659 132700 569392 > 2251

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 252, 904)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction