Information on Result #476340

There is no (92, 252, 172)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 8023 002373 163389 899795 158150 114062 958508 913100 855805 536200 865000 269784 769500 > 2252

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (92, 253, 172)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction