Information on Result #476347

There is no (106, 252, 213)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 8330 576848 128409 754015 778939 588180 644205 162556 782802 380976 108649 343312 293588 > 2252

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (106, 253, 213)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction