Information on Result #476377

There is no (166, 252, 919)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7303 520385 720784 360705 812634 223586 887394 358769 704853 932491 623721 247386 106992 > 2252

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (166, 253, 919)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction