Information on Result #476419
There is no (91, 253, 170)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 19911 469594 354375 896993 457889 466847 179915 991829 706231 377427 809860 134455 331220 > 2253
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (91, 254, 170)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |