Information on Result #476441

There is no (135, 253, 366)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 16464 344748 308409 103746 081944 677863 784196 634190 842277 836201 329053 239582 681240 > 2253

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (135, 254, 366)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction