Information on Result #476456

There is no (165, 253, 866)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 15053 021620 539671 357695 999525 964162 705428 007896 904929 745870 607477 595096 592368 > 2253

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 254, 866)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction