Information on Result #476500

There is no (96, 254, 182)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 35399 192415 108807 026976 510796 561622 541671 025794 518189 200582 711293 034660 771264 > 2254

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 255, 182)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction