Information on Result #476500
There is no (96, 254, 182)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 35399 192415 108807 026976 510796 561622 541671 025794 518189 200582 711293 034660 771264 > 2254
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (96, 255, 182)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |