Information on Result #476534
There is no (164, 254, 817)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 29038 016462 121766 119894 934743 827133 383176 308448 608586 356481 718200 154835 269528 > 2254
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (164, 255, 817)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |