Information on Result #476537

There is no (170, 254, 1032)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 29709 442345 640943 881833 951764 131918 922719 576801 033167 650014 595177 849844 938880 > 2254

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (170, 255, 1032)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction