Information on Result #476537
There is no (170, 254, 1032)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 29709 442345 640943 881833 951764 131918 922719 576801 033167 650014 595177 849844 938880 > 2254
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (170, 255, 1032)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |