Information on Result #476557
There is no (210, 254, 27031)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 28951 713331 535544 706408 819165 600359 268505 412732 220384 445080 620539 851137 444837 > 2254
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (210, 255, 27031)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |