Information on Result #476615
There is no (165, 255, 831)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 59095 934894 100964 106332 940066 709388 716962 763152 018150 614807 290717 211060 461500 > 2255
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (165, 256, 831)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |