Information on Result #476658
There is no (92, 256, 171)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 126879 960979 045036 484549 333279 744526 046376 847085 643036 112270 176965 373934 346300 > 2256
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (92, 257, 171)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |