Information on Result #476660

There is no (96, 256, 181)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 126995 422390 618562 709040 505298 559615 252931 446514 140054 033245 725596 465229 078494 > 2256

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 257, 181)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction